Public Perception on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Seto Satriyo Bayu Aji Masaryk University

Keywords:

public perception, corporate social responsibility, general public, academicians, consumer

Abstract

This article comprehensively reviews academic publications exploring people's beliefs and perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The evolving concept of CSR, which emphasizes the generation of shared value, has made it an essential consideration for companies in today's society. The article highlights the positive and negative impacts that companies have on the environment and emphasizes the importance of CSR in mitigating these effects. The literature review examines the selected articles from reliable and credible sources through a content analysis methodology to gain insights into people's perceptions of CSR. The study categorizes the findings based on the viewpoints of the general public, consumers, and academicians. The results indicate that the general public holds diverse opinions on CSR, ranging from scepticism to recognizing its importance for society. Consumers' perspectives vary depending on income levels and cultural contexts, while academicians generally appreciate corporate social initiatives. The article contributes to the existing literature by summarizing and analyzing the various perceptions of different stakeholders toward CSR activities, offering valuable insights for professional practice and future research.

References

Almeida, R. A., Dickinson, J., Maybery, M. T., Badcock, J. C., & Badcock, D. R. (2010). The radial frequency search task with additional segmentation cues. Journal of Sociology, 48(14), 4117-4124.

Abraham, E. M., Asor, V., Torviawu, F., Yeboah, H., & Laryea, F. (2018). Public perception of corporate social responsibility of AngloGold Ashanti in Obuasi Municipality, Ghana. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(3), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2016-0149

Arli, D. I., & Lasmono, H. K. (2010). Consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility in a developing country. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00824.x

Axjonow, A., Ernstberger, J., & Pott, C. (2018). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Corporate Reputation: A Non-professional Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3225-4

Bae, J., & Kim, S. (2013). The influence of cultural aspects on public perception of the importance of CSR activity and purchase intention in Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 23(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2012.725174

Bagire, V. A., Tusiime, I., Nalweyiso, G., & Kakooza, J. B. (2011). Contextual environment and stakeholder perception of corporate social responsibility practices in uganda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.252

Barkakati, U., Patra, R. K., & Das, P. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and its impact on consumer behaviour - A consumer’s perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 8(4), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSOC.2016.082366

Burcea, M., & Marinescu, P. (2011). Students’ perceptions on corporate social responsibility at the academic level. case study: The faculty of administration and business, university of Bucharest. Amfiteatru Economic, 13(29), 207–220.

Carvalho, S. W., Sen, S., Mota, M. de O., & de Lima, R. C. (2010). Consumer reactions to CSR: A Brazilian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(SUPPL 2), 291–

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0620-0

de Vries, G., Terwel, B. W., Ellemers, N., & Daamen, D. D. L. (2015). Sustainability or profitability? How communicated motives for environmental policy affect public perceptions of corporate greenwashing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(3), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1327

Dudenhausen, A., Röttger, U., & Czeppel, D. (2019). Do Corporations Communicate What the General Public Expects? Investigating the Gap between Corporate Self- image and Public Perceptions of Corporate Responsibility. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1688335

Flora Hung-Baesecke, C. J., Chen, Y. R. R., & Boyd, B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility, media source preference, trust, and public engagement: The informed public’s perspective. Public Relations Review, 42(4), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.015

Hamidu, A. A., Md Haron, H., & Amran, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review on Definitions, Core Characteristics and Theoretical Perspectives.

Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, September 2016. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p83

Hyejoon, Rim & Chuqing, D. (2017). Trust and distrust in society and publics’ perception of CSR: a cross-cultural study. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(1), 1–

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2017-0016

Kim, J. K., Overton, H., Hull, K., & Choi, M. (2018). Examining public perceptions of CSR in sport. Corporate Communications, 23(4), 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2018-0060

Kim, Y. S., & Choi, Y. (2012). College Students’ Perception of Philip Morris’s Tobacco- Related Smoking Prevention and Tobacco-Unrelated Social Responsibility. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.626138

Latapí Agudelo, M. A., Johannsdottir, L., & Davidsdottir, B. (2019). Drivers that motivate energy companies to be responsible. A systematic literature review of Corporate Social Responsibility in the energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119094

Latapí Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018- 0039-y

Lee, K. H., & Shin, D. (2010). Consumers’ responses to CSR activities: The linkage between increased awareness and purchase intention. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.014

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, T. P. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Momin, M. A. (2013). Social and environmental NGOs’ perceptions of Corporate Social Disclosures: The Case of Bangladesh. Accounting Forum, 37(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.005

Mueller, T. S. (2014). Consumer perception of CSR: Modeling psychological motivators.

European Journal of Development Research, 26(3), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2014.9

Ramesh, K., Saha, R., Goswami, S., Sekar, & Dahiya, R. (2019). Consumer’s response to CSR activities: Mediating role of brand image and brand attitude. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1689

Shauki, E. (2011). Perceptions on corporate social responsibility: A study in capturing public confidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.267

Smirnova, Y. (2012). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility in Kazakhstan. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(3), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111211247974

Toro, J. A. O., & Ferré-Pavia, C. (2017). The perception of the corporate reputation of the stakeholders from a communication company: How televisió de catalunya is affected by communicating a corporate social responsibility action. In Palabra Clave (Vol. 20, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2017.20.2.8

Wong, A., Long, F., & Elankumaran, S. (2010). Business students’ perception of corporate social responsibility: The United States, China, and India. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(5), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.216

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31